Get rid of bad acting once and for all.

Nothing puts a nail in the coffin of independent film like bad acting. You can get away with bad camera work…people will call it ‘Cinema Verde’ (that’s latin for too shakey to see what the hell is going on). But your film absolutely cannot escape a slow agonizing death if it contains even a hint of bad acting.

But, hey…what can you do? You can’t afford to hire professional actors. The only people willing to be in your movie are your friends, and your crazy aunt Kathy. Ok, so maybe your shooting DV and you can afford to shoot alot more takes than the average film…but by the time your taking 15 takes for each shot tempers begin to flare. So now you have to settle. Stupid actors…what’s wrong with them?

Well, sorry buddy….you’re the problem. The fact is there bad acting is more often than not really bad direction in disguise.

Have you ever caught yourself saying things like this:

• In this scene, you get really angry and start throwing things around.
• Here your sad because your boyfriend is leaving to go to the war
• Here your trying to be sneaky and creep up on the guard

Can you catch the problems with these statements? Each and everyone of these statements is an example of bad direction. Unfortunately, sometimes statements like these yield good performances. I know you may think that is a good thing, but if sometimes it yields a good performance then, as a director, you’ll never learn that its bad technique. Instead you’ll think, “it worked last time….this guy must be a terrible actor”. Then later it will work again and you’ll think, “damn, finally a good actor”. Pretty soon you’ll feel at the mercy of some random and esoteric quality of acting ability. What is really happening is your getting random results because you’re giving poor guidance.

You’ll find yourself in a similar situation at every audition. Trying to find some magic quality that is going to work when you get on set. But once again…you’ll find everything to be random. What is going on?

Lets examine the above “bad direction” statements for clues.

In this scene, you get really angry and start throwing things around.
One of the worst thing you can ever do is tell an actor how to feel. When you tell someone to act angry, what you’ll end up with is someone who looks like they are trying to act angry. Their face will tighten up and they’ll try to act super mean. But is that how we really react to anger? We react all sorts of ways to anger…sometimes we yell, sometimes we say nothing. Sometimes we even cry. But if you tell someone to be angry, they will always act the same way….mean.

Lets say for example a man and his wife is having an arguement. The wife is talking extremely fast and he can’t get a word in. You want him to get angry at a specific point and throw his coffee mug across the room so she stops talking.

Pretty much everyone will throw the coffee mug perfectly. Its easy…its just an action…you throw a mug fast. The part that will really show up as bad acting is the part just before the throwing. As the wife rattles off a continuous stream of words, the male actor will act more and more angry, until finally he gets mad enough to throw a cup. And it will look completely stupid.

The reason it will look stupid is because he’s trying to look angry. Don’t think in terms of the actor, but think in terms of the character. The wife is going on and on, and her husband is trying to look angry at her….trying to make her see that he is angry. Does that make sense? It doesn’t….he isn’t trying to show her he is getting angry…its just happening naturally as a result of the situation. If he is trying to show her he is getting angry it almost gives the impression that he’s been planing to pretend to be angry even before the conversation started.

So how do we direct our actor the right way? Easy, you tell him what he is trying to do. The wife is rattling off so many words he can’t get a word in. Tell him: “You are trying to get her to listen, but she won’t let you get a word in. Keep trying to cut her off, and when she doesn’t stop, throw the cup so she shuts up.”

Notice that there are no feeling words in that statement….its only actions. After all they are called actors not feelers.

If you give an actor that sort of direction the scene will play out a bit more like this: The woman will begin talking, he’ll try and say something…almost timidly…not angry but she won’t stop. Getting a little more frustrated he’ll try to say something, but she’ll just get louder and more intense. Finally, he’ll get so frustrated he’ll throw the cup.

NEVER TELL YOUR ACTORS HOW TO FEEL

Here your sad because your boyfriend is leaving to go to the war
This one is along the same theme, but a bit tougher. Once again, you’re telling your actor how to feel. But wait, there is no real action in such a scene. Maybe a girl and her boyfriend are having their last meeting before he leaves for war….or possible its even a scene where she is just sitting at home thinking about the fact that he is leaving. But unlike the previous scene there isn’t really a specific action that you can tell her to do. So what do you say to your actress?

Tell her: Think about your boyfriend leaving, and that you may not ever see him again, but you’re trying not let anyone see how you feel. We humans rarely wear our true emotions on our sleeves, we’re always hiding our true thoughts and feelings. A girl whose boyfriend is going off to war is never trying to act sad (unless she really isn’t). Instead she tries to stay strong, and not let anyone see how worried she is. The beautiful thing is that when you tell someone to pretend they are not feeling a certain way, they come across as feeling exactly that way. Think about it…how many times has someone sad to you “Don’t laugh…” and of course the very next thing you do is laugh?

With some actors and actresses such a suggestion has a risk of creating what will seem (on set) to be a flat performance. If this is the case, shine a dim light in the actor’s eyes (try not to blind them). Just enough to where you can see the light in their eyes on camera. If it still seems flat…then keep it. The camera (and editing) does some pretty magical things. You’ll be surprised at how these “flat” performances really sizzle once you add a sound track and intercut it with other elements of the scene.

A short side note: You film history buffs may remember a little thing called the Kuleshov Experimen. Essentialy Kuleshov made a short film where he intercut the face of an actor, Ivan Mozzhukhin, with various other shots. Mozzhukhin had a completely blank expression, but when the shot of his face was intercut with a bowl of soup, audiences said he looked hungry. The same shot of his face and a baby girl in her crib, and audiences thought Mozzhukin was cheerfully watching the little girl. The same shot of Mozzhukin again, but this time with an older woman in a coffin, and audiences thought he was in solemn mourning over the death of this woman. Not only did these audiences think he was feeling these emotions…they even raved at his performance. Not bad considering all he did was ‘look down at the camera’

Here your trying to be sneaky and creep up on the guard
Ok…so this one doesn’t contain any feeling words…but its still not quite right. After all, you’re telling the actor to try to be sneaky. How do you do such a thing? Well, unfortunately, more often than not an actor’s usual attempt at being sneaky is only slightly more realistic than a kid trying to sneak up on a leprechaun to take his lucky charms.

The solution though is still the same…tell the actor what he is trying to do. Tell him: Don’t let the guard hear you or see you, and take them out.